In ORCYS universities, research institutions, ministries, NGO's and local companies from Namibia and Germany cooperate with a common goal: Find ways to make wildlife-based land-use sustainable.
Under the light of local knowledge ORYCS uses a broad set of research technics including field observations, experiments, remote sensing and mathematical modelling.
Students are an essential part of ORYCS. Tandem-research projects, a PhD teaching program and summer schools will bring together students from different parts of the world.
In order to share some real-life impressions of ORYCS research work, we created a tumblr BLOG Check it out!
Please visit the SPACES II Training website to find all information regarding this course. Due to Covid-19, this course will be postponed into mid-February 2021.
PhD student Robert is wrapping up his movement ecology project in this nice and short video:
In October 2020 the SPACES II mid-term-meeting was held online. Members of all terrestrial and marine SPACES II projects gathered with decisionmakers and BMBF/DST/NCRST representatives to exchange ideas and report back on project status. Please visit the SPACES II Training website to find some ORYCS posters with summaries of ongoing work
A real-life Conservation Travel series, documenting the current real time behind the scenes life of active conservation in Namibia, putting CONSERVATION FIRST.Eps 38 and following feature ORYCS work
Since the measures to prevent further spread of COVID-19 lead to severe restrictions of international travel and also due to recent lockdowns in Namibia, we decided to move our 2020 all-team meeting to ZOOM. It took Place on Oct. 5th and 6th 2020. A physical meeting is now scheduled for mid-May 2021 in Windhoek, Namibia
Namibian savannas are hot spots of climate, land-use and socio-economic change that function as model-region for many savannas worldwide. Increasing temperatures, changing amounts and distribu- tions of precipitation, rising levels of atmospheric CO 2 together with intensifying land-use threaten the functioning of these sensitive ecosystems and thus the livelihood of thousands of households who depend on a sustainable provision of multiple ecosystem services (e.g. water provision, forage production, biodiversity and tourism). Maladapted land management increases the risk of land degradation and loss of ecosystem services by disrupting the regulating functions of complex feedbacks between geo- and biosphere, for example between herbivores, vegetation, soil, water and carbon. Already today much of Namibia’s rangelands are in an alarmingly degraded state (e.g. 31.5% of Namibia’s land surface suffers from bush encroachment) with concomitant impacts on the national economy including the tourist industry, and observed increases in poverty levels. Thus, new land-use options that are better adapted to changing environmental conditions are urgently needed.
One recent important development is a widespread change from domestic livestock production towards wildlife-based management strategies. In Namibia, in addition to National Parks, currently about 35% of the land surface is dedicated to wildlife-based management thereof 20% in 79 communal conservancies and 15% on freehold conservancies and private game farms. Applications for the approval of further conservancies are currently under revision. Not only the identification of the economic value of wildlife management (e.g., trophy hunting, game meat production, eco-tourism) has led to this change, but wildlife-based land use options have been strongly supported by National policies such as the National Rangeland Policy or Namibia’s 2nd National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2013-2022. Key reasons for this policy support are the predicted potentials and benefits of wildlife management to conserve key ecosystem services including biodiversity and indigenous knowledge, to reduce land degradation for example through shrub encroachment, and the higher adaptive capacity of native herbivores to unfavourable conditions as compared to livestock.
In principle, these potential advantages would make wildlife-based land use an ideal option for adaptive management under regional and global climate change. Surprisingly, however, the predicted positive effects have never been put to thorough scientific scrutiny, even though many conservancies and commercial wildlife ranches have been operating for almost 20 years. In fact, many game farms exhibit a poorer savanna rangeland quality and lower species diversity than neighbouring livestock farms and wildlife-based management often seems to be poorly adapted to local conditions.
Given this background, the overarching key objective of ORYCS is to provide the first, urgently needed, scientifically rigorous assessment of wildlife-based land use options in Namibian savannas that can be extrapolated to similar savanna systems worldwide. In ORYCS we use the traditional definition of wildlife i.e. large, wide-ranging and undomesticated animal species. We specifically focus on endemic large herbivores with different feeding patterns (Mountain zebra, Plains zebra, Kudu, Oryx and Eland antelopes) and human-wildlife conflict species (elephants and large predators such as lions and leopards) that have a high intrinsic value and are vital to Namibian savannas. By understanding and aiming to improve wildlife-based management options, ORYCS contributes to better protect all other biodiversity of plants and smaller animal species that shelter under the canopy of selected wildlife.
ORYCS is structured in six workpackages (WP1-6). WP1 is the overarching workpackage and coordinates ORYCS. WPs are centered on the main scientific tasks of the project and interlinked to each other in several ways reflecting the interdisciplinary approach of the project (see respective sections 5 in WP descriptions in part II).
The project coordination (in WP1) will be based at the University of Potsdam (Jeltsch, Blaum). On the Namibian side, project coordination of field work will be supported by NUST (Hauptfleisch), while the technical coordination of workshops and the education & exchange program will be supported by UNAM (Wanke). Transparency of decision-making is the foundation of ORYCS project management and will be achieved by (i) making fundamental decisions within a steering committee consisting of all workpackage leaders and (ii) by having a German-Namibian co-lead for each workpackage. Further, the project will start with a kick-off and initial stakeholder workshop including all project partners members, followed by annual workshops and a final conference with a stakeholder outreach workshop. Continuous evaluation of project progress by WP1 will assure successful achievement of milestones (see workpackage description for details) and facilitate synergistic cooperation between workpackages.
A scientifically sound assessment of wildlife-based land use options in savannas is currently hampered by an insufficient understanding of their short and long term impacts on key ecosystem processes and services. Complex geo-biosphere feedbacks impede the understanding of the processes and there are major knowledge gaps on the full feedbacks between vegetation composition, condition and dynamics, animal behaviour, soil processes, and eco-hydrological dynamics under different scenarios of land use and climate. In close dialogue with stakeholders, ORYCS will apply a combination of field observations and experiments, remote-sensing, socio-ecological assessments, and process-based computer models to close these knowledge gaps. Immediate and final results will be disseminated, exchanged and discussed with stakeholders, land-use experts, students and researchers during summer schools, national stakeholder workshops and trainings, the scientific exchange program, German-Namibian tandem research projects and one international outreach workshop. These steps will largely advance our understanding of the potentials and risks associated with wildlife-based land use for the conservation of biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and services and rangeland livelihoods. ORYCS thus aims for a reliable scientific basis for recommendations on sustainable use and management of wildlife in savanna rangelands under current and future climatic conditions and atmospheric CO 2 concentrations.
NUST-Biodiversity Research Centre | involved in workpackages 2,1 and 6
Etosha Heights Private Reserve
Etosha National Park
Hobatere Communal Conservancy
Mr. John Kasaona (IRDNC)
Mr. André Nel (Etosha Heights)
Mr. Harald Marggraff (Rangeland expert)
Coordination, Wildlife modelling and Synthesis
The overarching goal of WP1 is the synthesis of results from all ORYCS WPs and to ensure the overarching project success. This is achieved by means of well-balanced project management,coordination and capacity building. On the scientific side, WP1 will use a model-based approach to integrate knowledge from ORYCS and beyond. Therefore, WP 1 will develop an agent-based animal-functional-type model that will describe wildlife populations in space and time and allow for an assessment of different management and climate scenarios on wildlife and ultimately also on vegetation dynamics and diversity.
Wildlife Movement and Biodiversity
WP2 explores feedbacks between wildlife-based land-use options (national park, game farm and communal conservancy), wildlife movements, vegetation, and related ecosystem services focussing on biodiversity. Our key objectives are to: (i) analyse historical and new data on different wildlife-based land-use options and wildlife movements to understand wildlife-predator-vegetation feedbacks (ii) understand the role of vegetation distribution, nutritional values and structural diversity for wildlife movements (iii) investigate the link between wildlife-vegetation feedbacks and human-wildlife conflicts (iv) assess the impacts and potential risk of wildlife land use for biodiversity conservation (v) design policy briefs and training materials for sustainable wildlife-grazing practice
Scale-crossing water fluxes
The focus of WP3 is set on water fluxes and the controls that vegetation, climate and soil exert over ecohydrological processes. This includes the influence of patch utilization by large wild herbivores on soil compactness, vegetation structure, woody plant architecture and plant functional attributes. We use tree sap flow and canopy interception measurements, from both experimental manipulations and observational studies; we determine groundwater recharge rates and we obtain precipitation trends from tree ring analysis. We plan to upscale these water related processes to different scales.
Eco-hydro-geomorphic remote sensing
The aim of WP4 is to understand long-term changes in savanna ecosystems, and to provide useful information on how they can best be managed and protected. We use state of the art remote sensing tools -- running from ground-based sensor networks and drone flights all the way up to regional climate models and rainfall maps -- to study short- and long-term changes in the local and regional environment. Our detailed local studies help to validate long-term and regional trends in temperature, rainfall, and vegetation, and give us important insights into how the ecosystem responds to change.
Ecohydrological modelling of plant diversity
WP5 will provide fundamental knowledge on the impacts of wildlife on plant functional diversity and resulting ecosystem function and services under global change. It will use a process-based, ecohydrological modelling approach (EcoHyD) to assess the coupled dynamics of water and vegetation under different scenarios of wildlife composition. This approach integrates empirical findings from other WPs within ORYCS and allows for understanding and quantifying the link between wildlife management, plant diversity and ecosystem functions (e.g. water fluxes, biomass) and services (e.g. carbon storage, water provision, forage production).
WP6 will conflate the crucial social-ecological components of ORYCS in order to disentangle the heterogeneous motivations for action and the existing indigenous and local knowledge as well as the specific knowledge demands of stakeholders. Stakeholders are considered from the local to the national level. Motivations, challenges and conflict areas will be analysed, including their socio-economic, cultural and institutional drivers. This facilitates the mutual understanding of stakeholders’ perspectives on interdependencies between wildlife-based management and ecosystem services and the development of strategies for an adapted wildlife-based management including constructive forms of conflict regulation.
OUR ADDRESSThe project coordination is organized from Potsdam, Germany. Ask us, if you are looking for a specific contact
+49 331 977 -4811
Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation | University of Potsdam | Am Mühlenberg 3 | 14476 Potsdam